| |
![]() |
| Hazard Analysis | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Work Activity: | Masonry, Tile, Cement & Plaster | ||
| Task: | Spread, level, and smooth concrete, mortar, or terrazzo mixtures | ||
| Hazard: | Skin contact with epoxy resin systems | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Problem: |
Workers who spread, level, and smooth concrete, mortar, or terrazzo mixtures may face hazards from skin contact with epoxy resin systems. Epoxy resins may be found in the following materials:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Description: |
Epoxy resin systems contain skin irritant compounds which may cause allergic dermatitis and other skin disorders including abrasions. Hexavalent chromium, a sensitizer which elicit allergic responses, may also be found in epoxies. Dermatitis is a general term for skin rashes and other skin ailments. Exposure to the compounds in epoxy resin systems can cause skin problems ranging from mild irritation to severe and long-lasting sores and rashes. The two main skin conditions caused by exposure to epoxy resin systems are irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level of Risk: |
Exposures are of such a magnitude and character that a significant number of workers risk developing serious long or short term health effects. There are no studies that tell us how many masons have allergic dermatitis, or how many will develop it in any given year (incidence), in the United States. We do have some information from workers compensation claims, but the true rate of dermatitis is certainly higher that the number of dermatitis claims to workers compensation, for research has shown that most occupational diseases are under-reported. In Oregon between 1990 and 1997 the claim rate to workers compensation was 7/100,000 construction workers, and a study from Germany found a similar incidence. A study in Finland found that almost 9% of concrete prefabrication workers had work-related hand dermatitis. Among construction workers with skin problems 65% of the dermatitis was caused by work, with 40% being allergic to chromium, 10% to nickel, and 7.5% to epoxy resins in one study. In the German study noted above, the incidence of dermatitis among tile setters and terrazzo workers was 10 times that of a low risk construction occupation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assessment Info: |
Here are some tools you can use to measure the risk for dermatitis, and find ways to reduce the risk. You might also think of other tools including:
Consider comparing your group of workers with themselves before and after beginning a program to reduce dermatitis (see solutions). Use written checklists. Watch your employees work and take reports from them of what they do to are compare a group before and after. Which best practices are the employees currently doing? Which are they failing to do? Keep a written record of observations. Have employees complete a symptoms checklist of the skin problems they currently have, with no names attached. Best Practices Checklist
Symptoms Checklist
Worksite conditions can determine whether a worksite material will cause skin problems.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Solutions: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regulations & Standards: |
OSHA standard 1926.28, titled Personal Protective Equipment, in safety and health regulations for construction must be in place. The employer is responsible for requiring the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees. OSHA standard 1926.59, titled Hazard Communication, in safety and health regulations for construction must be in place. The purpose of this section is to ensure that the hazards of all chemicals produced or imported are evaluated, and that information concerning their hazards is transmitted to employers and employees. This transmittal of information is to be accomplished by means of comprehensive hazard communication programs, which are to include container labeling and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets and employee training. Regulations adopted by a state must be at least as protective as the corresponding federal standard. Work may also be subject to rules of other federal, state and local agencies. Even where there is no hazard specific standard, OSHA prohibits employers from to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to his health or safety.
Federal OSHA Standards are enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor in 26 states. There are currently 22 states and jurisdictions operating complete State plans (covering both the private sector and state and local government employees) and 5 - Connecticut, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and the Virgin Islands - which cover public employees only. If you are working in one of those states or jurisdictions you should ensure that you are complying with their requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||